movies

Chat about non-baseball topics. No political discussions!
Post Reply
User avatar
pioneer98
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 22007
Joined: July 15 08, 8:24 pm
Location: High A Minors

Re: movies

Post by pioneer98 »

I saw Cloud Atlas last night. My thoughts are below. I don't really spoil any plot points, but I do talk a little about a key symbol a bit. If you want to go into the movie with a totally clear mind to get your own interpretation of all the symbolism, then don't read below. Otherwise, what I say below could possibly nudge you towards an interpretation.
[SHOW]
I'm reading some reviews of this movie this morning. It is getting "mixed" reviews. None of the critics seem to fully understand this movie, even the critics who really liked it! Check out Ebert's review. He's mystified, but still gave it 4 stars.

I'm about 80% of the way through the book. I'm struggling to piece together all the details in the book, too, but reading it did help me follow the movie. The people I was with were able to follow the movie without having read any of the book. It is very easy to follow the plot of the 6 stories. But connecting the symbolism and intertwined characters is much harder.

This is the spoilerest part of what I was going to say: There is a comet-shaped birthmark that mark appears on different characters through the 6 stories. There are a bunch of themes, but this symbol is the key to understanding one of the main themes, IMO. Sadly, the critics I've read clearly don’t understand this symbol. It would be like trying to review the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey, and having no clue what the monolith represented. I really don't want to say much more about it than that. If you understand this symbol, obviously you get more out of the movie. If you don't understand this symbol, the movie is still entertaining, interesting, and funny, but it might seem a bit hokey.

The movie is still hokey in a couple spots. Especially the last story set in the far distant future. They maybe tried following the book too closely on that one (especially regarding dialog). The rest of the stories are done pretty well. The best ones in my opinion are the one set in 1930s Europe and the one set in Korea in 2144. Tom Hanks, Halle Berry and Hugh Grant were better in some roles than in others. Hugo Weaving was himself. I thought Jim Broadbent, Doona Bae and Jim Sturgess were excellent. In general, the beginning was weaker, but it got better as it went. Maybe it was just getting used to flashing between 6 stories back and forth. The movie has some flaws, but I really liked it.

Vidor
You've just been hit by...VidorSmarm™
Posts: 22956
Joined: June 10 10, 7:50 pm

Re: movies

Post by Vidor »

I saw "Cloud Atlas". Wasn't sure what to make of the evil spirit that kept whispering into Tom Hanks's ear in the last timeline.

User avatar
pioneer98
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 22007
Joined: July 15 08, 8:24 pm
Location: High A Minors

Re: movies

Post by pioneer98 »

Vidor wrote:I saw "Cloud Atlas". Wasn't sure what to make of the evil spirit that kept whispering into Tom Hanks's ear in the last timeline.
My take on it (contains spoilers):
[SHOW]
Yeah, I’m not sure if it is a spirit, his imagination, or a “possession”. If you look at all the characters that Tom Hanks played, they were murderers, thieves, etc…the exception might have been the 1970s story when he was a scientist. But even in that story, it wasn’t clear to me what his role was within that company, or what his motives were. That last story to me was the final confrontation between evil and good within his soul.

This is all a lot more complicated in the book. Obviously, in the book, the characters are not played by actors to tie them all together nicely like I just did. In the book, the characters are only tied together by common themes. It makes it a lot more open to interpretation. The movie is just one interpretation.

Vidor
You've just been hit by...VidorSmarm™
Posts: 22956
Joined: June 10 10, 7:50 pm

Re: movies

Post by Vidor »

And speaking of "Cloud Atlas", apparently it made $9.4M over the weekend. Cost $100M to make. Ouch. Oh well, I liked it.

User avatar
pioneer98
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 22007
Joined: July 15 08, 8:24 pm
Location: High A Minors

Re: movies

Post by pioneer98 »

It says a lot about the state of the film industry when Cloud Atlas can barely outperform Paranormal Activity 4, Silent Hill 2 and Taken 2.

User avatar
thrill
bronoun enthusiast
Posts: 30539
Joined: April 14 06, 10:45 pm
Location: barely online

Re: movies

Post by thrill »

pioneer98 wrote:It says a lot about the state of the film industry when Cloud Atlas can barely outperform Paranormal Activity 4, Silent Hill 2 and Taken 2.
Is it a referendum on the film industry or an example of how impossibly vague trailers and incredibly complicated source material lead to an apathetic viewing public?

User avatar
Popeye_Card
GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
Posts: 31085
Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am

Re: movies

Post by Popeye_Card »

bob thrill wrote:
pioneer98 wrote:It says a lot about the state of the film industry when Cloud Atlas can barely outperform Paranormal Activity 4, Silent Hill 2 and Taken 2.
Is it a referendum on the film industry or an example of how impossibly vague trailers and incredibly complicated source material lead to an apathetic viewing public?
Yeah, I see the trailers and I have no idea what Cloud Atlas is about. It just looks...weird.

The other movies have pretty clear plots, and those that like that type of plot are ready and willing to go to the theater to see those movies.

User avatar
JL21
NPR & THT Contributor
Posts: 36109
Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
Location: Chocolate City

Re: movies

Post by JL21 »

bob thrill wrote:
pioneer98 wrote:It says a lot about the state of the film industry when Cloud Atlas can barely outperform Paranormal Activity 4, Silent Hill 2 and Taken 2.
Is it a referendum on the film industry or an example of how impossibly vague trailers and incredibly complicated source material lead to an apathetic viewing public?
And it's also a statement about the power of sequels and unoriginal content. Those other films have a brand name that's already established, which is going to resonate with moviegoers. I'm not saying it's right or that people have to like it, but that's just the way it works.

Vidor
You've just been hit by...VidorSmarm™
Posts: 22956
Joined: June 10 10, 7:50 pm

Re: movies

Post by Vidor »

I think both are true--the state of the film industry is horrible, but "Cloud Atlas" was a tough sell.

User avatar
ghostrunner
GOAT
Posts: 30870
Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm

Re: movies

Post by ghostrunner »

JL21 wrote:
bob thrill wrote:
pioneer98 wrote:It says a lot about the state of the film industry when Cloud Atlas can barely outperform Paranormal Activity 4, Silent Hill 2 and Taken 2.
Is it a referendum on the film industry or an example of how impossibly vague trailers and incredibly complicated source material lead to an apathetic viewing public?
And it's also a statement about the power of sequels and unoriginal content. Those other films have a brand name that's already established, which is going to resonate with moviegoers. I'm not saying it's right or that people have to like it, but that's just the way it works.
Yeah. How many movies does the average person see a year? 5 or 6? Those people aren't going to choose Cloud Atlas. I'd say my tastes are more obscure than most, but I'm a parent of two and I've seen exactly one movie in a theater this year - Dark Knight Rises just the other day. If I see one more, it will probably be Skyfall, with my wife. I'm one of those people now. The risky stuff is reserved for Netflix.

Post Reply