Agreed, but if a batter has lots of HRs against you, for example, I think that's telling. Solid contact in even 15-20 ABs means you see the pitches well.ZigZagCardsFan wrote:Fun with small sample sizes! BvP data is rarely significant, despite what Tony LaRussa would like us to believe.
Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)
- Big Amoco Sign
- Master of Hyperbole
- Posts: 14398
- Joined: December 1 17, 11:05 am
Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)
- ZigZagCardsFan
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 5526
- Joined: July 29 06, 6:26 pm
-
cardsfantx
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 12218
- Joined: November 6 10, 10:58 am
Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)
Thanks Bob Nightingale!ZigZagCardsFan wrote:

-
Spider John
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 10952
- Joined: May 18 06, 10:09 pm
- Location: East of the middle of West Tennessee
Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)
Ole Bob finally got one right.
- haltz
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 22630
- Joined: November 9 06, 6:45 am
- Location: a proud midwestern metropolis
Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)
It means you hit the pitches well. There's very little evidence that it's predictive at all.Big Amoco Sign wrote:Agreed, but if a batter has lots of HRs against you, for example, I think that's telling. Solid contact in even 15-20 ABs means you see the pitches well.ZigZagCardsFan wrote:Fun with small sample sizes! BvP data is rarely significant, despite what Tony LaRussa would like us to believe.
- MrCrowesGarden
- 'Burb Boy
- Posts: 24841
- Joined: July 9 06, 11:33 am
- Location: Out of the Loop
-
cardsfantx
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 12218
- Joined: November 6 10, 10:58 am
Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)
that's just NL, but yeah...pretty damn good.MrCrowesGarden wrote:
Yelich is #2 in NL, Ozuna, # 3 in NL, and Stanton is #2 in AL
if the marlins had held onto all 3, then in the entire MLB, they'd have #3 (stanton), #6 (yelich), and #9 (ozuna)...crazy
the thread mentioning how good our outfield in STL will be next year? what about MIA last year...
-
phins
- Sobbing quietly during Fox programming
- Posts: 12085
- Joined: June 9 06, 3:51 pm
Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)
Miami had the #10 offense last year. They were a force offensively and that was with a few significant holes. If they had the funding, they really could've been a team with young talent and a great core. The tragic passing of Jose Fernandez hurt them a lot, or this could've been a true playoff team core.cardsfantx wrote:that's just NL, but yeah...pretty damn good.MrCrowesGarden wrote:
Yelich is #2 in NL, Ozuna, # 3 in NL, and Stanton is #2 in AL
if the marlins had held onto all 3, then in the entire MLB, they'd have #3 (stanton), #6 (yelich), and #9 (ozuna)...crazy
the thread mentioning how good our outfield in STL will be next year? what about MIA last year...
Of course, new ownership just tore it down for bread crumbs, but still.
- Hoot45
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 4008
- Joined: October 8 14, 11:41 am
Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)
What is Wheeler using? Among NL OF's I see the Cardinals have 3 of top 17, Dodgers 3 of top 18, Pirates 3 of the top 20, Mets/Phillies 2 of the top 20.
-
cardsfantx
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 12218
- Joined: November 6 10, 10:58 am
Re: Marcell Ozuna Watch - (Update: Traded to Cards Pg. 13)
http://www.fangraphs.com/projections.as ... &players=0Hoot45 wrote:What is Wheeler using? Among NL OF's I see the Cardinals have 3 of top 17, Dodgers 3 of top 18, Pirates 3 of the top 20, Mets/Phillies 2 of the top 20.
you may have to click on the WAR column to sort if it's not sorted already


