Like trill said, I bet they bring all the "healthy" players. I'm sure it's in their contracts. Sure, Aguero and Mata and Hazard may only play a half, but they'll be out there.greenback44 wrote:I doubt the organizers care, as long as they can put "English Premiere League Fixture!" on the ticket. The EPL has a massive international following, and this is as close as many of those fans can get to a live game.trill wrote:They organize these tours with stipulations that most of the big players will be there. They don't pay them millions to bring over the youth team.greenback44 wrote: It's more like a spring training game between the Dodgers' AAA affiliate and the Yankees' AAA affiliate. You might get appearances from the Tim Federowiczes and David Aardmas, which I'm sure will be exciting.
I don't see how anybody expect the top players to show up for a friendly a few thousand miles away from England four days after the EPL season ends.
Rant: Soccer
- robbotis
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 4791
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:05 am
- Location: Minneapolis
Re: Rant: Soccer
- Fat_Bulldog
- likes to grate his own cheese
- Posts: 12878
- Joined: May 9 06, 12:41 pm
- Location: Drunk
Re: Rant: Soccer
Soccer is so terrible.
- robbotis
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 4791
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:05 am
- Location: Minneapolis
Re: Rant: Soccer
It's Football, and it sold out in 20 minutes.Fat_Bulldog wrote:Soccer is so terrible.
- Fat_Bulldog
- likes to grate his own cheese
- Posts: 12878
- Joined: May 9 06, 12:41 pm
- Location: Drunk
Re: Rant: Soccer
The soccer type of football is terrible.robbotis wrote:It's Football, and it sold out in 20 minutes.Fat_Bulldog wrote:Soccer is so terrible.
-
Vidor
- You've just been hit by...VidorSmarm™
- Posts: 22956
- Joined: June 10 10, 7:50 pm
Re: Rant: Soccer
"I'm sleepy."trill wrote:The sport speaks for itself
-
Vidor
- You've just been hit by...VidorSmarm™
- Posts: 22956
- Joined: June 10 10, 7:50 pm
Re: Rant: Soccer
Yep, if it's not a 0-0 game it's a 1-0 game. A sport has real problems when a long list of scores look like a curse word written in binary code. Also, if five-year-olds can actually mimic it tolerably well, you have a problem. There's a reason why soccer has caught on so much as a youth sport.jim wrote:Another criticism I have of the sport - would we all agree that lead changes in games tend to correlate to excitement? Wouldn't more lead changes be a more exciting game? How many lead changes to you get in soccer. Do you ever get lead changes? I never hear of a team coming back from a 2-0 deficit, it seems like the team that makes it 1-0 wins about 99% of the time. At worst they tie.
I will say, though, that there are two things good about it. The lack of commericals is nifty. And damn, it moves quickly. Two halves, a halftime, that "extra time" business, done in less than two hours usually, right?
- JackofDiamonds
- Bringer of Boston Baked Blue Balls
- Posts: 15010
- Joined: April 16 06, 9:15 pm
Re: Rant: Soccer
Now you're just trolling. You think T-Ball is as watchable as MLB because 5-year olds are mimicking it?
- Fat_Bulldog
- likes to grate his own cheese
- Posts: 12878
- Joined: May 9 06, 12:41 pm
- Location: Drunk
Re: Rant: Soccer
Soccer is horrible.
- Richie Allen
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 7458
- Joined: December 22 06, 1:06 am
Re: Rant: Soccer
You guys really think a 30-22 game would be more exciting just because there were more goals? One of the main reasons I find soccer so exciting is because it's often a tied or one score game right up until the final second. In other words, every possession is potentially a winning or tying score. Very exciting.Vidor wrote:Yep, if it's not a 0-0 game it's a 1-0 game. A sport has real problems when a long list of scores look like a curse word written in binary code. Also, if five-year-olds can actually mimic it tolerably well, you have a problem. There's a reason why soccer has caught on so much as a youth sport.jim wrote:Another criticism I have of the sport - would we all agree that lead changes in games tend to correlate to excitement? Wouldn't more lead changes be a more exciting game? How many lead changes to you get in soccer. Do you ever get lead changes? I never hear of a team coming back from a 2-0 deficit, it seems like the team that makes it 1-0 wins about 99% of the time. At worst they tie.
I will say, though, that there are two things good about it. The lack of commericals is nifty. And damn, it moves quickly. Two halves, a halftime, that "extra time" business, done in less than two hours usually, right?
-
jim
- Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
- Posts: 50393
- Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm
Re: Rant: Soccer
I don't think kicking a ball around a field and running after it could be exciting period.Richie Allen wrote:You guys really think a 30-22 game would be more exciting just because there were more goals? One of the main reasons I find soccer so exciting is because it's often a tied or one score game right up until the final second. In other words, every possession is potentially a winning or tying score. Very exciting.Vidor wrote:Yep, if it's not a 0-0 game it's a 1-0 game. A sport has real problems when a long list of scores look like a curse word written in binary code. Also, if five-year-olds can actually mimic it tolerably well, you have a problem. There's a reason why soccer has caught on so much as a youth sport.jim wrote:Another criticism I have of the sport - would we all agree that lead changes in games tend to correlate to excitement? Wouldn't more lead changes be a more exciting game? How many lead changes to you get in soccer. Do you ever get lead changes? I never hear of a team coming back from a 2-0 deficit, it seems like the team that makes it 1-0 wins about 99% of the time. At worst they tie.
I will say, though, that there are two things good about it. The lack of commericals is nifty. And damn, it moves quickly. Two halves, a halftime, that "extra time" business, done in less than two hours usually, right?


