I'd say there's a reasonable chance that the player(s) that they sign to replace him will be more of the same....... and they'll have to give away another draft pick in order to clear up that space a couple years from now.Faceman wrote:They took all his salary right? $17M over the next two years.MrSaigon wrote:It is a little surprising to me that the best deal they could find for Hinrich was with a draft pick. Seems like they could have dealt him straight up for a waivable player (but most of those situations have a buy out that counts against cap). Anyway, I imagine they tried to get their best deal. In either case--if he's a cheap young guy, or they just have his rights while he's developing in Europe, having Seraphin wouldn't be bad at all.
Giving away a pick to free that up is a no-brainer. Half the veteran deals in the NBA are terrible from a production vs. cost standpoint.
NBA Offseason Thread.
-
Socnorb11
- The Last Word
- Posts: 21909
- Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am
Re: NBA Offseason Thread.
-
Faceman
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 4800
- Joined: May 23 06, 11:56 am
- Location: Memphis, TN
Re: NBA Offseason Thread.
If he is overpaid (paid more than his value), why would anyone give up anything valuable in return?MrSaigon wrote:Hinrich is a solid, if overpaid player. It's not like their dumping Eddy Curry here. He has on court value. It is surprising to me that they couldn't do better. Like, as I said, trade him for someone waivable, or trade him for rights to a Euro, and keep the draft pick.Faceman wrote:They took all his salary right? $17M over the next two years.MrSaigon wrote:It is a little surprising to me that the best deal they could find for Hinrich was with a draft pick. Seems like they could have dealt him straight up for a waivable player (but most of those situations have a buy out that counts against cap). Anyway, I imagine they tried to get their best deal. In either case--if he's a cheap young guy, or they just have his rights while he's developing in Europe, having Seraphin wouldn't be bad at all.
Giving away a pick to free that up is a no-brainer. Half the veteran deals in the NBA are terrible from a production vs. cost standpoint.
I imagine they did their part. I'm surprised is all.
The Wiz were paid to take on a net liability.
If the "waivable player" is in effect a net zero (no value, no cost) then the Wizards would be saying "well, sure we'll take your overpaid player for nothing, thanks".
It's like when the RedSox put ManRam on irrevocable waivers after 2003. He's a great hitter, but nobody picked him up.
-
Faceman
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 4800
- Joined: May 23 06, 11:56 am
- Location: Memphis, TN
Re: NBA Offseason Thread.
Not likely. Kirk Hinrich was the #7 player overall drafted in 2003. So not only is he a 7 year veteran (which means more pay), but he's also a lottery pick.Socnorb11 wrote:I'd say there's a reasonable chance that the player(s) that they sign to replace him will be more of the same....... and they'll have to give away another draft pick in order to clear up that space a couple years from now.Faceman wrote:They took all his salary right? $17M over the next two years.MrSaigon wrote:It is a little surprising to me that the best deal they could find for Hinrich was with a draft pick. Seems like they could have dealt him straight up for a waivable player (but most of those situations have a buy out that counts against cap). Anyway, I imagine they tried to get their best deal. In either case--if he's a cheap young guy, or they just have his rights while he's developing in Europe, having Seraphin wouldn't be bad at all.
Giving away a pick to free that up is a no-brainer. Half the veteran deals in the NBA are terrible from a production vs. cost standpoint.
JJ Redick would be the same / better and cost much less.
-
Socnorb11
- The Last Word
- Posts: 21909
- Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am
Re: NBA Offseason Thread.
Good example with Redick. Have you heard that the Bulls are talking to him?Faceman wrote:Not likely. Kirk Hinrich was the #7 player overall drafted in 2003. So not only is he a 7 year veteran (which means more pay), but he's also a lottery pick.Socnorb11 wrote:I'd say there's a reasonable chance that the player(s) that they sign to replace him will be more of the same....... and they'll have to give away another draft pick in order to clear up that space a couple years from now.Faceman wrote:They took all his salary right? $17M over the next two years.MrSaigon wrote:It is a little surprising to me that the best deal they could find for Hinrich was with a draft pick. Seems like they could have dealt him straight up for a waivable player (but most of those situations have a buy out that counts against cap). Anyway, I imagine they tried to get their best deal. In either case--if he's a cheap young guy, or they just have his rights while he's developing in Europe, having Seraphin wouldn't be bad at all.
Giving away a pick to free that up is a no-brainer. Half the veteran deals in the NBA are terrible from a production vs. cost standpoint.
JJ Redick would be the same / better and cost much less.
-
Faceman
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 4800
- Joined: May 23 06, 11:56 am
- Location: Memphis, TN
Re: NBA Offseason Thread.
No - but I heard that if the Bulls got Bosh and LBJ, that Redick was the shooter they'd target. Who knows what happens if LBJ doesn't go there.
Quite the spectacle this has become.
Quite the spectacle this has become.
-
MrSaigon
Re: NBA Offseason Thread.
I wouldn't think, even at $17 mil over two years, Hinrich for nothing is a deal that needs sweetening. I've already chosen a losing argument, however, because it did.
-
AJ
Re: NBA Offseason Thread.
How will the bulls feel if Lebron walks onto the stage and simply says "I'm following vinny to la" 
-
jim
- Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
- Posts: 50393
- Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm
Re: NBA Offseason Thread.
I'm glad someone from the "inside" said it.Socnorb11 wrote:MrSaigon wrote:"It's gotten ridiculous," Orlando coach Stan Van Gundy said. "It's almost like a parody of itself, this whole situation now. Come on, an hour long? It takes 15 seconds to say I've decided to stay in Cleveland but we've got another 59 minutes and 45 seconds to, what? Promote LeBron James? "As if we don't do that enough. Look, the guy's a great player and wherever he goes, my bet would be Cleveland, that place will be excited. But an hour-long special?"
![]()
- omaha_red
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 12963
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:53 am
- Location: toning it done
Re: NBA Offseason Thread.
let's just keep up the ridiculousness why don't we..
per rotoworld
per rotoworld
LeBron James has reportedly booked a party at the W Hotel in Miami for Saturday night.
Yes, he's going to Carmelo Anthony's wedding in New York on Saturday, but it seems feasible that he could jet to Miami in time for an old fashioned throwdown at the W that night. All signs are pointing to him signing with the Heat - now more than ever.
- Leroy
- a bad penny always turns up
- Posts: 25228
- Joined: April 17 06, 12:27 pm
- Location: Hanging out with my redneck, white socks and Blue Ribbon beer.
- Contact:
Re: NBA Offseason Thread.
I'll believe it when I hear an airport report.omaha_red wrote:let's just keep up the ridiculousness why don't we..
per rotoworld
LeBron James has reportedly booked a party at the W Hotel in Miami for Saturday night.
Yes, he's going to Carmelo Anthony's wedding in New York on Saturday, but it seems feasible that he could jet to Miami in time for an old fashioned throwdown at the W that night. All signs are pointing to him signing with the Heat - now more than ever.

