Much better. Feel free to call it great.TimeForGuinness wrote:Ok, I'll clarify 2005, not "as" good. Not "as" good at 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000...since he became a cardinal.GatewaySnayke wrote:But the stats ain't lying. Yes, Edmonds has fallen from his apex of 2004. The point is, that despite his fall from grace, he's still among the best center fielders in baseball. To say that 2005 was "not good" is an outright lie.TimeForGuinness wrote:I know his stats say one thing and that's fine, but he has been declining the past two years while battling injuries and getting older.
I am sure that Edmonds is going to be protected by La Russa. I would be very surprised if he starts much against lefties this season.
Lies, Damned Lies: PECOTA Projected Standings, NL Central
- GatewaySnayke
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 11923
- Joined: July 23 06, 11:54 pm
- Location: GatewaySnaykebird
-
TimeForGuinness
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 20007
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm
Not when he hit .263.GatewaySnayke wrote:Much better. Feel free to call it great.TimeForGuinness wrote:Ok, I'll clarify 2005, not "as" good. Not "as" good at 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000...since he became a cardinal.GatewaySnayke wrote:But the stats ain't lying. Yes, Edmonds has fallen from his apex of 2004. The point is, that despite his fall from grace, he's still among the best center fielders in baseball. To say that 2005 was "not good" is an outright lie.TimeForGuinness wrote:I know his stats say one thing and that's fine, but he has been declining the past two years while battling injuries and getting older.
I am sure that Edmonds is going to be protected by La Russa. I would be very surprised if he starts much against lefties this season.
- skmsw
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 6340
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:12 pm
- Location: The Hub
Hmmm. I think of Soriano and Jones and Izturis and deRosa as very weak OBP guys. I'm not sure which of you guys is messing with which.GatewaySnayke wrote:That's just silly to say. Alfonso Soriano, Aramis Ramirez, Jacque Jones, Mark DeRosa and Cesar Izturis are notorious for being base cloggers. I wouldn't be surprised to see those guys all near a .400 OBP.Mephistopheles wrote:The Cubs won't lead the division in OBP. It's not humanly possible.
And of course Soriano's doubled up walk rate from his career norms is for real. Heck, this season it's going to be tripled!
- GatewaySnayke
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 11923
- Joined: July 23 06, 11:54 pm
- Location: GatewaySnaykebird
Huh? You're not seriously using batting average to gauge Edmonds' 2005 are you?TimeForGuinness wrote:Not when he hit .263.GatewaySnayke wrote:Much better. Feel free to call it great.TimeForGuinness wrote:Ok, I'll clarify 2005, not "as" good. Not "as" good at 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000...since he became a cardinal.GatewaySnayke wrote:But the stats ain't lying. Yes, Edmonds has fallen from his apex of 2004. The point is, that despite his fall from grace, he's still among the best center fielders in baseball. To say that 2005 was "not good" is an outright lie.TimeForGuinness wrote:I know his stats say one thing and that's fine, but he has been declining the past two years while battling injuries and getting older.
I am sure that Edmonds is going to be protected by La Russa. I would be very surprised if he starts much against lefties this season.
-
jagtrader
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 12614
- Joined: June 5 06, 10:01 am
I'm optimistic this team will score more runs than it gives up, regardless of what a computer projection says.Leroy wrote:I should do a poll...
How do you feel about this season?
Wildly optimistic.
Somewhat optimistic.
Neutral.
Somewhat pessimistic.
Wildly pessimistic.
On suicide watch.
Some of the negativity surrounding a world championship team is astounding.
- Cronos
- In perpetuum
- Posts: 34778
- Joined: June 30 06, 7:49 am
- Location: St. Louis
How do you feel about this season?
Wildly optimistic.
Somewhat optimistic.
Neutral.
Somewhat pessimistic.
Wildly pessimistic.
On suicide watch.[/quote]
I'm fairly positive that if the teen scores more runs than the other, they'll win the gang.
Call me optomistic about that!
Wildly optimistic.
Somewhat optimistic.
Neutral.
Somewhat pessimistic.
Wildly pessimistic.
On suicide watch.[/quote]
I'm fairly positive that if the teen scores more runs than the other, they'll win the gang.
Call me optomistic about that!
Last edited by Cronos on March 27 07, 2:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Popeye_Card
- GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
- Posts: 31010
- Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am
-
98navigator
- Everyday Player
- Posts: 176
- Joined: February 12 07, 4:34 pm
Talk about blanket statements. It's fair to say that many of those projecting the outcomes aren't fans of either team.Popeye_Card wrote:Never underestimate the power of springtime. Cardinals fans are pessimistic, Cub fans are optimistic.jagtrader wrote:
Some of the negativity surrounding a world championship team is astounding.
--P--
- Popeye_Card
- GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
- Posts: 31010
- Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am
I'm talking about the fans commenting on those projections.98navigator wrote:Talk about blanket statements. It's fair to say that many of those projecting the outcomes aren't fans of either team.Popeye_Card wrote:Never underestimate the power of springtime. Cardinals fans are pessimistic, Cub fans are optimistic.jagtrader wrote:
Some of the negativity surrounding a world championship team is astounding.
--P--
Cardinal fans are looking at them and saying, "We might suck!" Cub fans are looking at them and saying, "We might be good!" Even though both teams are right in the same ballpark.
Plus I'm just kidding. There's plenty of Betty Brightsides and Debbie Downers on both sides.
--P--


