nice post. why?InvincibleCakeEater wrote:That's a super lame article.
I find it to be pretty spot on in that James is making many PR mistakes....whatever his final decision is.
nice post. why?InvincibleCakeEater wrote:That's a super lame article.
It sounds like the author is just hating on LeBron to hate on LeBron. I don't see how it's a PR mistake in any way. It's going to get insane ratings, money is going to charity and the only people that are going to be upset about it are the fans of teams that LeBron didn't choose (and they would have been ticked either way).stlouie_lipp wrote:nice post. why?InvincibleCakeEater wrote:That's a super lame article.
I find it to be pretty spot on in that James is making many PR mistakes....whatever his final decision is.
Did you actually read the article? Please feel free to disagree, but at least articulate your reasons for doing do.InvincibleCakeEater wrote:It sounds like the author is just hating on LeBron to hate on LeBron. I don't see how it's a PR mistake in any way. It's going to get insane ratings, money is going to charity and the only people that are going to be upset about it are the fans of teams that LeBron didn't choose (and they would have been ticked either way).stlouie_lipp wrote:nice post. why?InvincibleCakeEater wrote:That's a super lame article.
I find it to be pretty spot on in that James is making many PR mistakes....whatever his final decision is.
He's created expectations that will be nearly impossible to live up to no matter what his decision is.I don't see how it's a PR mistake in any way
It's a partnership between a sports marketing machine that tries to pass itself off as a sports journalism source (and is successful doing so because of the idiots who still think it's sports "news") and James who just wants to be a part of that "sports news" largely because he has anchored himself to some high school teammate who is just milking him for any dime he can get. It's not about charity, and if you think it is than you are foolish. It's about him, and only him and I think any discerning sports fan can see that.It's going to get insane ratings, money is going to charity and the only people that are going to be upset about it are the fans of teams that LeBron didn't choose
Ding Ding.thrill wrote:That article is lame. That guy has had the red ass for LeBron for a long time now. I don't understand what's in it for an NBA writer to be annoyed by this. LeBron has given his articles more page hits in the last two weeks than anything, maybe ever.
Wojo has good sources, he's a good writer but I don't understand his p.o.v. on LeBron. Yes he's an egomaniac, but it's pretty weak and hypocritical to criticize him for it considering the other stories that come out about similar superstars. He's not Tiger getting caught banging porn stars and whooahz, he's not A Rod doing steroids or Lance Armstrong doping and being an a hole. He's super aware of who he is, what he has to offer and how best to maximize his golden years and he's doing it to the fullest. It might rub you the wrong way out of jealousy or whatever, but as a professional writer covering the NBA, it's stupid to do anything but love this guy.
Doesn't surprise me, and actually I'm really happy we approached it this way. I get the impression that LeBron basically controlled everything in Cleveland. And the sending of the shoes was awesome, even if it turned him off completely.Rieges wrote:I haven't seen this included in any story or report but J.A. Adande just reported on ESPN that his sources tell him that the Bulls presentation to LBJ didn't go over so well with him. He indicated that the "Are you up to filling Jordan's shoes?" pitch and allegedly making a point of telling him that his entourage wouldn't have the same kind of "pull" that they have in Cle didn't sit well. It doesn't really jive with the reports that they Bulls had one of the longer meetings with James but interesting comments nonetheless.