St. Louis Rams 2011 Offseason Thread

A forum for non-baseball sports
Post Reply
User avatar
TGantz
R-E-S-P-E-C-T...What Dr Pepper Means to Me
Posts: 6698
Joined: July 27 06, 11:59 pm
Location: The Lou

Re: St. Louis Rams 2011 Offseason Thread

Post by TGantz »

Great signing. I'm extremely excited for this season to start, especially if we have a good draft.

Freed Roger
Seeking a Zubaz seamstress
Posts: 26073
Joined: September 4 07, 1:48 pm
Location: St. Louis

Re: St. Louis Rams 2011 Offseason Thread

Post by Freed Roger »

Sam Bradford - out as the rookie of the year. Suh in.

I'm ok with that. And as a Ram fan, I will admit I was wrong a year ago when i preferred Suh over Bradford for their pick.

Other news coming from Dallas - Atogwe says he is going to stay a Ram. Ex-Ram Dmarco Farr caught by TMZ cursing
Last edited by Freed Roger on February 3 11, 2:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
MrCrowesGarden
'Burb Boy
Posts: 24841
Joined: July 9 06, 11:33 am
Location: Out of the Loop

Re: St. Louis Rams 2011 Offseason Thread

Post by MrCrowesGarden »

Freed Roger wrote:Sam Bradford - out as the rookie of the year. Suh in.

I'm ok with that. And as a Ram fan, I will admit I was wrong a year ago when i preferred Suh over Bradford for their pick.
That's for the Pepsi ROY.

There's still awards given out on the offensive and defensive side (which should be Bradford and Suh's without much competition).

User avatar
lukethedrifter
darjeeling sipping elite
Posts: 37260
Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
Location: Huis Clos

Re: St. Louis Rams 2011 Offseason Thread

Post by lukethedrifter »

Freed Roger wrote:Sam Bradford - out as the rookie of the year. Suh in.

I'm ok with that. And as a Ram fan, I will admit I was wrong a year ago when i preferred Suh over Bradford for their pick.
Other news coming from Dallas - Atogwe says he is going to stay a Ram. Ex-Ram Dmarco Farr caught by TMZ cursing
I won't. I'm really happy with Bradford, of course, but I think I'd be equally happy with Suh.

Freed Roger
Seeking a Zubaz seamstress
Posts: 26073
Joined: September 4 07, 1:48 pm
Location: St. Louis

Re: St. Louis Rams 2011 Offseason Thread

Post by Freed Roger »

lukethedrifter wrote:
Freed Roger wrote:Sam Bradford - out as the rookie of the year. Suh in.

I'm ok with that. And as a Ram fan, I will admit I was wrong a year ago when i preferred Suh over Bradford for their pick.
Other news coming from Dallas - Atogwe says he is going to stay a Ram. Ex-Ram Dmarco Farr caught by TMZ cursing
I won't. I'm really happy with Bradford, of course, but I think I'd be equally happy with Suh.
I'm happy with Bradford, but some of the superlatives being heaped on him are premature IMO. His last quarter-season was not good.

Nevertheless, I'd put my happiness over Bradford as a Ram at slightly higher than the hypothetical Suh/Ram. The improved Ram defensive line play (robbins etc) has a role in the opinion.
Last edited by Freed Roger on February 4 11, 1:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Icy Monster
Gateway Cheddar
Posts: 42
Joined: December 17 10, 7:15 pm

Re: St. Louis Rams 2011 Offseason Thread

Post by Icy Monster »

lukethedrifter wrote:
Freed Roger wrote:Sam Bradford - out as the rookie of the year. Suh in.

I'm ok with that. And as a Ram fan, I will admit I was wrong a year ago when i preferred Suh over Bradford for their pick.
Other news coming from Dallas - Atogwe says he is going to stay a Ram. Ex-Ram Dmarco Farr caught by TMZ cursing
I won't. I'm really happy with Bradford, of course, but I think I'd be equally happy with Suh.
You should admit your wrong then. The Rams would have won 2 or maybe 3 games with Suh. No way they reach the playoffs next year with Feeley throwing to AJ Green.

User avatar
TheoSqua
Next Gen Wart
Posts: 8951
Joined: April 22 06, 6:53 pm
Location: St. Louis
Contact:

Re: St. Louis Rams 2011 Offseason Thread

Post by TheoSqua »

Icy Monster wrote:
lukethedrifter wrote:
Freed Roger wrote:Sam Bradford - out as the rookie of the year. Suh in.

I'm ok with that. And as a Ram fan, I will admit I was wrong a year ago when i preferred Suh over Bradford for their pick.
Other news coming from Dallas - Atogwe says he is going to stay a Ram. Ex-Ram Dmarco Farr caught by TMZ cursing
I won't. I'm really happy with Bradford, of course, but I think I'd be equally happy with Suh.
You should admit your wrong then. The Rams would have won 2 or maybe 3 games with Suh. No way they reach the playoffs next year with Feeley throwing to AJ Green.
Icy Monster's opinion is clearly superior to lukethedrifter's on the internets, this is a monumentious occasion. (see, Sarah Palin isn't the only one who can invent words!)

User avatar
lukethedrifter
darjeeling sipping elite
Posts: 37260
Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
Location: Huis Clos

Re: St. Louis Rams 2011 Offseason Thread

Post by lukethedrifter »

TheoSqua wrote:
Icy Monster wrote:
lukethedrifter wrote:
Freed Roger wrote:Sam Bradford - out as the rookie of the year. Suh in.

I'm ok with that. And as a Ram fan, I will admit I was wrong a year ago when i preferred Suh over Bradford for their pick.
Other news coming from Dallas - Atogwe says he is going to stay a Ram. Ex-Ram Dmarco Farr caught by TMZ cursing
I won't. I'm really happy with Bradford, of course, but I think I'd be equally happy with Suh.
You should admit your wrong then. The Rams would have won 2 or maybe 3 games with Suh. No way they reach the playoffs next year with Feeley throwing to AJ Green.
Icy Monster's opinion is clearly superior to lukethedrifter's on the internets, this is a monumentious occasion. (see, Sarah Palin isn't the only one who can invent words!)
I am dumb after all.

User avatar
Donnie Ebert
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 6660
Joined: June 15 06, 9:11 am
Location: Reading The Boat Rocker by Terence Mann

Re: St. Louis Rams 2011 Offseason Thread

Post by Donnie Ebert »

Icy Monster wrote:You should admit your wrong then.
Wait, "admit your wrong" or "admit you're (as in 'you are') wrong"? Which one is it? The fate of the argument hangs in the balance!

I would agree that Suh will have more of an impact over his career, but after a year, he and Bradford are very close, so I'm not disappointed with the pick.

User avatar
TheoSqua
Next Gen Wart
Posts: 8951
Joined: April 22 06, 6:53 pm
Location: St. Louis
Contact:

Re: St. Louis Rams 2011 Offseason Thread

Post by TheoSqua »

Donnie Ebert wrote:
Icy Monster wrote:You should admit your wrong then.
Wait, "admit your wrong" or "admit you're (as in 'you are') wrong"? Which one is it? The fate of the argument hangs in the balance!

I would agree that Suh will have more of an impact over his career, but after a year, he and Bradford are very close, so I'm not disappointed with the pick.
I don't believe that anyone on the field can have as big of an impact as a franchise quarterback. If Bradord reaches the level of the elite QBs in the league then it's basically not possible for Suh to be more valuable.

Post Reply