Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: March 18 18, 8:20 pm
GatewayRedbirds.com
A Message Board Dedicated to Discussing St. Louis Cardinals Baseball!
https://gatewayredbirds.org/forum/
"not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Page 136 of 140
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: March 18 18, 8:30 pm
http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/2282 ... -violationTwins SS Jorge Polanco suspended 80 games
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: March 18 18, 8:32 pm
Yelich looks bulked up.
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: March 19 18, 3:33 pm
Thames got him on the roids.ZigZagCardsFan wrote:Yelich looks bulked up.
Only a joke [expletive]
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: March 19 18, 4:30 pm
This isn't really anything MLB did but I don't know that it's worthy of its own thread, so this seemed like an appropriate spot.
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: March 19 18, 7:33 pm
Thames got tested three times while you wrote that post.CardsofSTL wrote:Thames got him on the roids.ZigZagCardsFan wrote:Yelich looks bulked up.
Only a joke [expletive]
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: March 19 18, 11:58 pm
Justin Turner broke his wrist in an at-bat. Him go bye-bye for a while.
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: March 20 18, 8:45 am
So if Verlander had flopped or gotten hurt after the trade, they wouldn't have owed anything? Makes no sense to me.MrCrowesGarden wrote: This isn't really anything MLB did but I don't know that it's worthy of its own thread, so this seemed like an appropriate spot.
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: March 20 18, 8:50 am
Maybe I'm just not understanding this, but how do you quantify the tax value of a player acquired in a trade?
Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread
Posted: March 20 18, 8:52 am
See all those capital gains taxes we avoided by not making any trades at the deadline last year? A brilliant act of efficiency. In fact I think we should be allowed to deduct Oh and Rosie's crap as long term losses. Accountants know it's not always bad having a few losers on your books if you are trying to minimize your tax liabilities! 