A healthy Juice would've been interesting to see. Luckily for Mizzou, he got hurt.Socnorb11 wrote:Strictly from a yardage standpoint. Turnovers killed Illinois (but that's part of the game, so you can't take that away from Missouri).RC21 wrote:Illinois outplayed Mizzou? Mizzou was blowing them out and was in control for a huge majority of the game. Illinois had a 2nd half flurry to make it look closer than it really was. Actually, it was a LOT like the Mizzou-KU game last night.
That's not to take anything away from Illinois, either. It did end up being a game in the 4th quarter. You could tell that day that the Illini had started to turn the corner. But they did not outplay Mizzou.
Kansas or Missouri ?
- thrill
- bronoun enthusiast
- Posts: 30539
- Joined: April 14 06, 10:45 pm
- Location: barely online
Re: Kansas or Missouri ?
- JL21
- NPR & THT Contributor
- Posts: 36109
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
- Location: Chocolate City
Re: Kansas or Missouri ?
That'd be like taking a look at a game in which one team has 11 hits, another has 6, and assuming that the 11-hit team outplayed the 6-hit team.Socnorb11 wrote:Strictly from a yardage standpoint. Turnovers killed Illinois (but that's part of the game, so you can't take that away from Missouri).
And yes, as you allude, turnovers killed Illinois. It's a good thing Mizzou forced them.
And on top of all of that, it's sort of silly to look at yardage as an indicator of who outplayed who. You don't think that Mizzou was running a different kind of offense with a 24 point lead? Or a different kind of defense, conceding yards but not big plays?
As for Juice and his injury..... Mizzou forced both Juice and McGee into dumb decisions and turned time from both QB's into the rout early on. McGee was the one that brought them back.
-
Socnorb11
- The Last Word
- Posts: 21906
- Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am
Re: Kansas or Missouri ?
RC21 wrote:That'd be like taking a look at a game in which one team has 11 hits, another has 6, and assuming that the 11-hit team outplayed the 6-hit team.Socnorb11 wrote:Strictly from a yardage standpoint. Turnovers killed Illinois (but that's part of the game, so you can't take that away from Missouri).
And yes, as you allude, turnovers killed Illinois. It's a good thing Mizzou forced them.
And on top of all of that, it's sort of silly to look at yardage as an indicator of who outplayed who. You don't think that Mizzou was running a different kind of offense with a 24 point lead? Or a different kind of defense, conceding yards but not big plays?
As for Juice and his injury..... Mizzou forced both Juice and McGee into dumb decisions and turned time from both QB's into the rout early on. McGee was the one that brought them back.
I was just looking beyond the final score. That's all. I didn't mean to be silly. Obviously Missouri had something to do with the turnovers, but when you get five of them, then I think the other team is just not focused, to some degree. I already stated that you can't take that away from Missouri, because it's part of the game. I'll state it again.
The best thing about seeing the Mizzou folks on top of the world is the re-assurance that it won't last long.
Last edited by Socnorb11 on November 26 07, 3:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Jocephus
- 99% conan clips
- Posts: 64992
- Joined: April 18 06, 5:14 pm
Re: Kansas or Missouri ?
[/youtube]
- Transmogrified Tiger
- Puppy Murderer
- Posts: 9323
- Joined: April 25 06, 6:07 pm
- Location: Across the River
Re: Kansas or Missouri ?
Honestly, I think the result would've been the same. Juice may not have fumbled the ball like McGee did, but he definitely wasn't going to make the throws that McGee made to bring the Illini back in that game.thrill wrote:A healthy Juice would've been interesting to see. Luckily for Mizzou, he got hurt.
- thrill
- bronoun enthusiast
- Posts: 30539
- Joined: April 14 06, 10:45 pm
- Location: barely online
Re: Kansas or Missouri ?
Nevertheless, interesting too see. Yes, Mizzou almost certainly would've won.Transmogrified Tiger wrote:Honestly, I think the result would've been the same. Juice may not have fumbled the ball like McGee did, but he definitely wasn't going to make the throws that McGee made to bring the Illini back in that game.thrill wrote:A healthy Juice would've been interesting to see. Luckily for Mizzou, he got hurt.
-
Socnorb11
- The Last Word
- Posts: 21906
- Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am
Re: Kansas or Missouri ?
Juice was 6 of 9 while he was in there, so I'm not sure you can say he "definitely" wasn't going to make the throws.Transmogrified Tiger wrote:Honestly, I think the result would've been the same. Juice may not have fumbled the ball like McGee did, but he definitely wasn't going to make the throws that McGee made to bring the Illini back in that game.thrill wrote:A healthy Juice would've been interesting to see. Luckily for Mizzou, he got hurt.
Throwing 2 interceptions in Missouri territory really killed Illinois' chances. McGee also dropped a ball on Missouri's 3 yard line that Missouri picked up for a touchdown (14 point swing). Another fumble on the Tigers' 37 yard line. All in all, 4 turnovers for McGee in Missouri territory. It's hard to imagine that Juice couldn't have done better, but that's the way it goes. Missouri earned the win. Too many mistakes by Illinois.
- Popeye_Card
- GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
- Posts: 31019
- Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am
Re: Kansas or Missouri ?
Also not to be lost in the discussion, but if Illinois played Ohio State in Columbus 10 times, Ohio State would win that game 9 times out of 10. As it played out, Illinois won.
Mizzou is better than Illinois, and they proved it on the field. Ohio State is also better than Illinois, even though they did not prove it on the field. I don't think we can accurately use Illinois--the only common opponent--as any sort of barometer about the relative quality of Mizzou vs. Ohio State. You can't even do that within a conference. Michigan beat Illinois on the road. Illinois beat Ohio State on the road. Ohio State beat Michigan on the road. (They all beat Penn State.
)
--P--
Mizzou is better than Illinois, and they proved it on the field. Ohio State is also better than Illinois, even though they did not prove it on the field. I don't think we can accurately use Illinois--the only common opponent--as any sort of barometer about the relative quality of Mizzou vs. Ohio State. You can't even do that within a conference. Michigan beat Illinois on the road. Illinois beat Ohio State on the road. Ohio State beat Michigan on the road. (They all beat Penn State.
--P--
- Dillagii
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 7926
- Joined: April 18 06, 2:37 pm
Re: Kansas or Missouri ?
People here know that my heart is in St.Louis. So they think I am Mizzou fan as well. Seeing the opportunity, I hopped onto Mizzou Bandwagon and giving it to Georgia and Georgia Tech fans 
- redbirdjazzz
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 4921
- Joined: April 17 06, 10:50 am
- Location: Columbia, MO
Re: Kansas or Missouri ?
Good going, Dill!DiLLaGii wrote:People here know that my heart is in St.Louis. So they think I am Mizzou fan as well. Seeing the opportunity, I hopped onto Mizzou Bandwagon and giving it to Georgia and Georgia Tech fans


