I don't think it's a case of the "violence" of the collisions. Hockey has a lot of things working against it in addition to body checks. There are boards all around the rink that do not move when your head hits them. It is played on a slick, hard surface. So if you fall backwards and slam your head against it--boom, concussion. If you get knocked down at full speed and slam into the boards the wrong way, boom--concussion. There's also a lot more looking around in hockey. Much more of a chance to get blindsided. Much harder for a defender to veer out of the way to avoid a dangerous hit when a guy isn't looking. Finally, at full speed, you travel much faster on skates than you can running. I don't think the helmets have nearly as much padding either. They certainly don't fit as tight.Hungary Jack wrote:I don't think so (maybe I'm biased because I played). I think the collisions in football are more numerous and more violent.lukethedrifter wrote:I'm guessing that once the research is done hockey will fare even worse than football.
As crazy as it sounds, hockey players are "tougher" than football players are too. The bravado of going out there and playing through injury, especially in the playoffs, is even higher than it is in football.
All told, I'd rank hockey as a higher risk.




