THT: Options are becoming more and more popular.

Discuss all things Cardinals Baseball
Post Reply
Michael
GRB Founder
Posts: 35303
Joined: December 31 69, 6:00 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

THT: Options are becoming more and more popular.

Post by Michael »

I wonder way players are more willing to take these...
In my Heater article this week, I took a broad look at all the contracts signed during the offseason. One of the things that struck me was just how popular contract options are becoming. During the offseason, about one-third of all free agent contracts included an option year, worth more than $380 million.

Nearly one-half of all contracts that included an option year were one-year deals, with a second-year option. I was a bit surprised by that, assuming that most option years would be associated with long-term contracts. Contract options used to be relatively simple things, in which the club could call an option on a player for a specific salary (or buy it out for a specific amount). Now, contracts can be triggered by all sorts of events, including playing time, a trade or MVP voting.

It gets complicated. For instance, if Jason Michaels has 375 plate appearances in 2008, he has the right to void the club's $2.6 million option for 2009. If Craig Counsell is traded during the next two years, the third-year club option will turn into a player option. The sixth year of Brian McCann's contract will become a club option year if McCann doesn't reach certain award thresholds in the previous five years.

I've tried to track and categorize all of these deals as best I can. Here's a table of how I categorized each offseason option deal:

Code: Select all

Type                         Dollars
Straight Club Option     $173,850,000
Club and/or Vesting       $74,900,000
Mutual                    $45,450,000
Vesting                   $40,425,000
Mutual/Vesting            $19,000,000
Player                    $16,000,000
Player/Club               $11,000,000
Club and/or Mutual         $2,600,000
Grand Total              $383,225,000
Hey, at least these guys are being creative, right?

Link

User avatar
Hungary Jack
Mother Earth
Posts: 19536
Joined: July 24 06, 6:03 am
Location: In Cognito

Post by Hungary Jack »

I guess in the owners' ideal world, all contracts would be pay-for-performance, a sort of piece-rate system where guaranteed money is eliminated. Obviously the PA and competitive bidding would never let this see the light of day, so I think options have become a popular way of insuring against downside (committing $$ to a guy whose performance declines rapidly or fails to meet expectations) and rewarding upside.

IMO, this certainly tilts in the owner's favor as most of the option $$ in the table fall into the "club" category. With MLB revenues rising at 10% per annum, clubs can also benefit dramatically from locking in future salaries at today's market rates. JD Drew and A-Ram were fortunate to have their opt-outs, because they benefitted massively from voiding their deals this offseason.

User avatar
JL21
NPR & THT Contributor
Posts: 36109
Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
Location: Chocolate City

Post by JL21 »

Hungary Jack wrote:I guess in the owners' ideal world, all contracts would be pay-for-performance, a sort of piece-rate system where guaranteed money is eliminated.
I believe it was when Marvin Miller really started getting cooking with free agency and player rights that one of the owners was thrilled about free agency. He wanted everyone to be a free agent after each year or something. I want to say it was our very own Gussie Busch.

User avatar
Hungary Jack
Mother Earth
Posts: 19536
Joined: July 24 06, 6:03 am
Location: In Cognito

Post by Hungary Jack »

RC21 wrote:
Hungary Jack wrote:I guess in the owners' ideal world, all contracts would be pay-for-performance, a sort of piece-rate system where guaranteed money is eliminated.
I believe it was when Marvin Miller really started getting cooking with free agency and player rights that one of the owners was thrilled about free agency. He wanted everyone to be a free agent after each year or something. I want to say it was our very own Gussie Busch.
Gussie was a smart business man. He didn't like to tie up capital in long-term assets, which is why he sold distributorships. He'd probably make a lousy MLB owner today.

Post Reply