Article on "perfect" coach, Dave Duncan

Discuss all things Cardinals Baseball
Post Reply
User avatar
clement
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 6008
Joined: April 20 06, 10:26 pm

Article on "perfect" coach, Dave Duncan

Post by clement »

For pitchers, Duncan the perfect coach
Coach revered for ability to get the best from hurlers

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd ... &fext=.jsp
JUPITER, Fla. -- Give him your retired, your injured, your muddled hurlers yearning to pitch free and easy.
Cardinals pitching coach Dave Duncan, it seems, will turn them all into at least serviceable big-league pitchers. He has developed a reputation for getting the very most out of veteran pitchers of nearly all stripes. Maybe they couldn't stay healthy. Maybe they couldn't harness their stuff. Maybe they just didn't know what their strengths were.

But for 28 years, they've been coming to "Dunc," and he's helped them make the best of their ability.

"He's a complete pitching coach," said manager Tony La Russa, "in the sense that whatever your issue is, he can deal with it."

The Cardinals are looking for Duncan to do it again this year with a rotation that has been drastically renovated. Along with youngsters Adam Wainwright and Anthony Reyes, St. Louis is counting on two pitchers who might be considered classic Duncan projects.

Kip Wells, once a frontline starter for the Pirates, has struggled with injuries and ineffectiveness for three seasons. Braden Looper has been a reliever for the entirety of his big-league career. Duncan fully expects that they will both be success stories at the end of the year.

"There are a lot of ways to pitch effectively at the Major League level," Duncan said. "You have to look and identify things that [a] guy can do to be an effective pitcher. Now, can he do them consistently? If you think he can, or he can gain the ability to do it consistently, then they're worth taking a shot on -- provided they're willing to work, they're good competitors and they're of good character."

Duncan and the Cardinals believe all of those qualifiers apply to Looper and Wells. So they believe they'll have two very good starting pitchers in Looper and Wells.

Are there other, more specific traits that make them "Duncan types," though? Duncan himself says not really.

"The common thread of the people you're talking about," he said, "is that they're all good competitors, good character and maybe not superstar ability, but certainly the ability to get Major League hitters out."

A few qualities do pop up again and again, however. Duncan relishes pitchers who throw sinking fastballs and throw strikes. A power arm isn't a must, but it certainly doesn't hurt. Mostly, the pitchers must be willing to buy into the plan.

"I was stubborn as a young kid, felt like I could throw the ball by everybody, or throw sinkers and break bats or whatever," said Looper. "But now I enjoy a different aspect of it -- the pitching part of it. Sink, cut, split. Slider first pitch, or whatever it is. That has been the most fun part of it."

And that may be one key to Duncan's run of success with veterans. To get the most out of a coach, players must be willing to listen to that coach. They must know what to listen for. And they must be willing and able to act on the suggestions.

"He doesn't say a lot, but when he does have something to say, it's definitely worth listening to," said Cal Eldred, who came out of retirement to pitch three years in relief for St. Louis. "And as soon as a player figures that out, the better. There's a lot of guys who get afraid when a coach doesn't talk to them. Sometimes that's not all that bad a thing. Dunc, he knows how to explain to pitchers what their responsibility is."

Duncan was the first person to suggest that Looper might make a quality starter, and it wasn't only a need-based assessment. He believes Looper can be more than just a body in a rotation that needs pitchers. He expects the right-hander to be a real contributor. He's always admired Wells' talent and competitiveness.

Those assessments go a long way with the Cardinals.

"He gets the ultimate confidence and respect," La Russa said.

So now Looper is refining his offerings and his mentality in order to try to be a successful starter. And Wells is looking to reach the level at which he pitched in 2002 and 2003 with the Pirates. They'll both be getting their first taste of starting for Duncan. They'll see the reams of data, and go through the intense meetings.

When Looper pitched in relief for the Cards, he got only a partial taste of all of that. Now that he'll be trying to get the same hitters out three and four times a game, the plan will be individualized more to his skills and strengths.

Wells, Looper and Eldred all say that individualization is a big part of Duncan's success. There's a plan, but it's attenuated to what the pitcher does well. Duncan identifies a pitcher's strengths, then helps maximize them.

"Obviously, you've got to improve on certain areas, but don't try to reinvent yourself," Wells said. "Don't try to be somebody you're not. And then, when you go out there, they have the best game plan to get you to produce as well as you can over the course of each game."

Asked for a specific improvement he made under Duncan, Eldred points to a very small one. A starter for his whole career, Eldred made the switch to throwing exclusively from the stretch once he began working as a reliever. It helped make his delivery more consistent, and his command more reliable.

"What his system is," said Eldred, "is that he shows you what your weapons are and shows you how to use them."

It's simple, but so very successful. And it's no coincidence that La Russa, the third-winningest manager in baseball history, has had Duncan by his side for 25 consecutive seasons.

They've worked together since 1983. In their first season together, the White Sox won 99 games, taking the American League West, and La Marr Hoyt won 24 games and the Cy Young Award. Since then it's been a pattern of success. Pitchers hook up with Duncan, La Russa, et al, and enjoy some of their finest seasons.

Hall of Famer Tom Seaver enjoyed a late renaissance with the Duncan-La Russa White Sox. Dave Stewart emerged as an ace, and one of the most feared pitchers of his era, in the first season in Oakland. Scott Sanderson re-emerged from a long dry spell for one fine year in Oakland.

Kent Bottenfield, who won 46 games in his entire big-league career, picked up 18 of those in his only full year as a member of the Cardinals rotation. Woody Williams, acquired in a waiver deal in August 2001, became an All-Star as a Cardinal. Most recently, it was Jeff Suppan and Jeff Weaver emerging as big-game winners for the 2006 World Series champions.

Not that it's done without help. Quite the contrary.

Bullpen coach Marty Mason helps with game planning and mechanical adjustments, and the catchers implement those plans on the field. The training staff helps get injured pitchers back on the mound and keeps healthy pitchers healthy. The front office identifies pitchers who may not have lived up to what they can accomplish.

"What you have in Dunc is really special," Eldred said. "Then what you have in Marty standing next to him is special. And then you have strength and conditioning with Pete [Prinzi]. You've got preparation with the training staff. And then you've got catchers -- if you don't have good catchers, you don't have a good team."

Duncan, himself a former catcher, leans heavily on his receivers. They must know and understand the plan, but they can't be robots. They need to be able to think on their feet -- or in a crouch, more accurately.

"They understand what we're trying to do," Duncan said. "And they put as much effort into being ready to implement a plan of attack as the pitchers do.

"It's taking a pitcher and being able to use him to his best advantage -- not letting him get beat on something that he's not proficient at doing. The way you're going to use Wells is going to be different than the way you use Anthony Reyes. You've got to understand that each guy has to take his style and apply it to the information we have."

Will Looper and Wells be the next guys to fuse talent with that information? Will they be the next to make the Cards' front office look brilliant for acquiring them, and Duncan look like a wizard for two more successful reinventions?

The record says it's more likely than not.

User avatar
Joe Shlabotnik
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 24217
Joined: October 12 06, 2:21 pm
Location: Baseball Ref Bullpen
Contact:

Post by Joe Shlabotnik »

Can't believe this hasn't gotten any comments.

I'm truly surprised at the second guessing of Dave Duncan on this forum. We might as well be back at CT the way so many here love to worry and stew over Duncan's calls. After 2 decades of proven success , you'd think he'd begin to get the benefit of the doubt from the knowledgable people around here.

User avatar
stlmark
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 4089
Joined: January 20 07, 1:57 am
Location: redbirdsnation

Post by stlmark »

In Duncan I trust! :bowdown:

User avatar
Hungary Jack
Mother Earth
Posts: 19536
Joined: July 24 06, 6:03 am
Location: In Cognito

Post by Hungary Jack »

The article and history clearly suggest that Duncan's magic works with experienced pitchers who have struggled to succeed at the major league level. Duncan clearly has the ability not only to assess a pitcher's strengths and weaknesses, but also to develop a strategy for utlilizing them, and for convincing an experienced hurler to change his approach.

Accepting this as truth, it easy to see why Duncan is criticized for not being able to develop young pitchers. Pitchers who have succeeded in the minor leagues and are forecast to do well in the bigs don't have a compelling reason to adopt Duncan's suggestions. They have not encountered mediocrity or failure like the Bottenfileds, Stewarts, and Woody's of the world. Why would a young promising pitcher change his approach if it has gotten him to the majors?

I think Duncan deserves the benefit of any doubt. His track record speaks for itself. If Reyes and AW can develop into reliable top 3 starters, perhaps the book on Duncan will be complete, and he'll get the credit he deserves.

AJ

Post by AJ »

I see these articles from time to time on Dunc and they never mention Carp.....

I don't know this, but I would assume the Duncan played a big part in analyzing wether or not Carp could come back off his injuries with the Jays, and if it was worth it to pay him for a season before he ever threw a pitch for the birds.

IMO, I think Carp and Stewart are the crown jewel pitchers to go down in Duncan's legacy.

User avatar
Joe Shlabotnik
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 24217
Joined: October 12 06, 2:21 pm
Location: Baseball Ref Bullpen
Contact:

Post by Joe Shlabotnik »

card_fan_in_chi wrote:I see these articles from time to time on Dunc and they never mention Carp.....

I don't know this, but I would assume the Duncan played a big part in analyzing wether or not Carp could come back off his injuries with the Jays, and if it was worth it to pay him for a season before he ever threw a pitch for the birds.

IMO, I think Carp and Stewart are the crown jewel pitchers to go down in Duncan's legacy.
And we're about to add Looper to that list!

* ducking and running for cover *

User avatar
skmsw
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 6340
Joined: April 18 06, 7:12 pm
Location: The Hub

Post by skmsw »

Duncan is good, there should be little doubt about that.

I do not think Carp is particularly Dunc-related, but that's just me, others may see it differently.

I guess as far as this year -- I think it is fine to give Dunc the benefit of the doubt and assume that he sees things that he likes.

But I also think that it is perfectly fair to notice -- we have a second-year pitcher coming off an ERA of 5; a second-year pitcher who struggled against lefties and has zero major league starts; a pitcher who has been neither healthy nor good in three seasons now; a 32-year old with zero major league starts and a career-long problem getting lefties; and in the wings, a guy coming off rotator cuff surgery, a one-pitch pitcher with one major league start, and a 32 year old fly ball pitcher who hasn;t had a start since his steroid suspension.

Even if Dunc is a magician -- what is it realistic to expect? Does he work magic with ALL of the questionmarks he gets? If he gets two good years out of four questionmark rotation spots, that's pretty good results for the coach; but it leaves us in a bit oif a spot nonetheless.

There is reason to be optimistic about all these guys. But there are also significant questions about them all.

User avatar
myersli
Everyday Player
Posts: 460
Joined: February 6 07, 12:50 pm
Location: Plainfield, IL

Post by myersli »

Completely new topic, but slightly related...

What I think is really sad is that coaches like Duncan and Mazzone are given so little award-type recognition for what they have done. Managers like LaRussa and Cox will get into the Hall of Fame because of their massive amount of wins and pennants. But, there are no pitching coaches in the Hall of Fame. (Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I checked the Hall of Fame roster and couldn't find any.) And, no prestigious coach of the year award. So, even though a team's success could be entirely predicated on the work of a pitching (or hitting) coach, they really receive no recognition except through articles like this one.

User avatar
Phyrkrakr
All-Star
Posts: 1514
Joined: January 15 07, 2:51 pm
Location: St. Louis

Post by Phyrkrakr »

myersli wrote:Completely new topic, but slightly related...

What I think is really sad is that coaches like Duncan and Mazzone are given so little award-type recognition for what they have done. Managers like LaRussa and Cox will get into the Hall of Fame because of their massive amount of wins and pennants. But, there are no pitching coaches in the Hall of Fame. (Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I checked the Hall of Fame roster and couldn't find any.) And, no prestigious coach of the year award. So, even though a team's success could be entirely predicated on the work of a pitching (or hitting) coach, they really receive no recognition except through articles like this one.
I know what you're saying, and I agree, but the reason pitching/hitting coaches aren't in the Hall of Fame is because they don't do anything you can quantify with numbers and compare against others. How would you grade Dave Duncan? By the ERA of his pitching staff? By the number of wins they get (oh, wait, that's the manager's tally) By their improvement under his tutelage, and subsequent decline? How would you measure that?

I'm not trying to be a prick, I'm just pointing out that it's very hard to objectively decide which ones would be in the Hall and which ones wouldn't. For a hitter, if a guy gets 3000 hits and his name isn't Pete Rose, he's in the Hall of Fame. For a pitcher, 300 wins is the magic number. I don't know much about the managers who are in the hall, but I'm guessing it's something like 600 career wins +/- a few World Series rings. There's really no statistical/objective way to gauge pitching coaches.

I would like to see some sort of seasonal award, maybe voted on by the players or something.

Post Reply