"not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread

Discuss all things Cardinals Baseball
Locked
User avatar
MrCrowesGarden
'Burb Boy
Posts: 24841
Joined: July 9 06, 11:33 am
Location: Out of the Loop

Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread

Post by MrCrowesGarden »

When we talk about Fowler being an overspend are we talking about in terms of years (or total dollars if you prefer) or AAV?

I'd agree on the former but not on the latter.

User avatar
cardsfansince82
is shooing asian children away from his fridge.
Posts: 27776
Joined: May 17 06, 10:23 pm
Location: at the gettin' place

Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread

Post by cardsfansince82 »

I think everyone would be much happier if they added one more all star caliber type player. They have the money and prospects to do that without threatening their long term competitiveness at all.

User avatar
Popeye_Card
GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
Posts: 30946
Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am

Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread

Post by Popeye_Card »

cardsfansince82 wrote:I think everyone would be much happier if they added one more all star caliber type player. They have the money and prospects to do that without threatening their long term competitiveness at all.
I'd certainly be happy with that, as long as the deal makes sense. For example JD Martinez is an All-Star caliber player who we can probably afford right now, but he doesn't make a whole lot of sense for the Cardinals to sign (IMO).

Socnorb11
The Last Word
Posts: 21900
Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am

Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread

Post by Socnorb11 »

Availability of all-star type players seems to be a problem right now. It's not just the Cardinals. Nobody is wheeling and dealing.

Diddy
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 3583
Joined: April 18 06, 7:45 pm

Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread

Post by Diddy »

I’ll be happy when this is all over and I can quit reading “puke point” all the time.

User avatar
MrCrowesGarden
'Burb Boy
Posts: 24841
Joined: July 9 06, 11:33 am
Location: Out of the Loop

Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread

Post by MrCrowesGarden »


User avatar
cardsfansince82
is shooing asian children away from his fridge.
Posts: 27776
Joined: May 17 06, 10:23 pm
Location: at the gettin' place

Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread

Post by cardsfansince82 »

Socnorb11 wrote:Availability of all-star type players seems to be a problem right now. It's not just the Cardinals. Nobody is wheeling and dealing.
I think there's more than it seems. Most of the contenders don't have payroll space or holes to fill and most of the rest don't have a lot of incentive to make moves. The Cardinals are positioned to take advantage of all of that.

Socnorb11
The Last Word
Posts: 21900
Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am

Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread

Post by Socnorb11 »

cardsfansince82 wrote:
Socnorb11 wrote:Availability of all-star type players seems to be a problem right now. It's not just the Cardinals. Nobody is wheeling and dealing.
I think there's more than it seems. Most of the contenders don't have payroll space or holes to fill and most of the rest don't have a lot of incentive to make moves. The Cardinals are positioned to take advantage of all of that.

I definitely agree. For whatever reason, everything seems to be at a stalemate right now. It's like a massive game of chicken.

I also agree that 1 more all-star level player (pitcher or position player, really) feels like it would push the team over the top. Hopefully they can find that guy.

User avatar
MrCrowesGarden
'Burb Boy
Posts: 24841
Joined: July 9 06, 11:33 am
Location: Out of the Loop

Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread

Post by MrCrowesGarden »

There it is.

User avatar
MinorLeagueGuy
The Angst is Real
Posts: 18447
Joined: September 8 10, 2:57 pm

Re: "not worthy of its own thread" offseason thread

Post by MinorLeagueGuy »

MrCrowesGarden wrote: There it is.
Damage control after their leak of information\protocol.

Locked