General Soccer Thread
-
Fat Strat
- Official GRB Sponsor of Larry Bigbie
- Posts: 28010
- Joined: April 17 06, 9:16 pm
- Location: No. 16 on the Cards Top 15 Prospect List
Re: General Soccer Thread
That's CONCACAF.
-
Gashouse
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 5010
- Joined: June 15 06, 6:11 am
- Location: Minneapolis
Re: General Soccer Thread
So what do you all think about the US-Mex-Can bid for 2026? I only read enough to see that 10 games would be played in mexico and canada each, and then the remaining 60 would be in the US. And isn't that the year it expands to 48 teams?
-
TimeForGuinness
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 20007
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm
Re: General Soccer Thread
I think it would have been nice to see a soccer stadium in St. Louis to host a game.Gashouse wrote:So what do you all think about the US-Mex-Can bid for 2026? I only read enough to see that 10 games would be played in mexico and canada each, and then the remaining 60 would be in the US. And isn't that the year it expands to 48 teams?
-
Gashouse
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 5010
- Joined: June 15 06, 6:11 am
- Location: Minneapolis
Re: General Soccer Thread
Did they list venues yet? Unfortunately, I doubt Mpls/St.Paul will host anything unless it's at the Gophers football stadium. the new Vikings monstrosity has an artificial turf and I assume the to-be-built MN United stadium will be too small for a WC game.TimeForGuinness wrote:I think it would have been nice to see a soccer stadium in St. Louis to host a game.Gashouse wrote:So what do you all think about the US-Mex-Can bid for 2026? I only read enough to see that 10 games would be played in mexico and canada each, and then the remaining 60 would be in the US. And isn't that the year it expands to 48 teams?
-
Fat Strat
- Official GRB Sponsor of Larry Bigbie
- Posts: 28010
- Joined: April 17 06, 9:16 pm
- Location: No. 16 on the Cards Top 15 Prospect List
Re: General Soccer Thread
I think it's a great idea. Has there ever been a World Cup that was hosted jointly by multiple countries? Seems like that would be the kind of thing that the organizers are looking for.Gashouse wrote:So what do you all think about the US-Mex-Can bid for 2026? I only read enough to see that 10 games would be played in mexico and canada each, and then the remaining 60 would be in the US. And isn't that the year it expands to 48 teams?
Except they're probably looking for money.
-
AWvsCBsteeeerike3
- "I could totally eat a pig butt, if smoked correctly!"
- Posts: 27539
- Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
- Location: Thinking of the Children
Re: General Soccer Thread
WE'RE GONNA BRIBE FIFA AND MAKE MEXICO PAY FOR IT!!
-
Gashouse
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 5010
- Joined: June 15 06, 6:11 am
- Location: Minneapolis
Re: General Soccer Thread
Japan and South Korea co-hosted in 2002. I'd guess co-hosting will be more common with the larger tournament.Fat Strat wrote:I think it's a great idea. Has there ever been a World Cup that was hosted jointly by multiple countries? Seems like that would be the kind of thing that the organizers are looking for.Gashouse wrote:So what do you all think about the US-Mex-Can bid for 2026? I only read enough to see that 10 games would be played in mexico and canada each, and then the remaining 60 would be in the US. And isn't that the year it expands to 48 teams?
Except they're probably looking for money.
- thrill
- bronoun enthusiast
- Posts: 30535
- Joined: April 14 06, 10:45 pm
- Location: barely online
Re: General Soccer Thread
FIFA won't let world cup games be played in anything smaller than NFL stadiums.TimeForGuinness wrote:I think it would have been nice to see a soccer stadium in St. Louis to host a game.Gashouse wrote:So what do you all think about the US-Mex-Can bid for 2026? I only read enough to see that 10 games would be played in mexico and canada each, and then the remaining 60 would be in the US. And isn't that the year it expands to 48 teams?
Gashouse wrote:
Japan and South Korea co-hosted in 2002. I'd guess co-hosting will be more common with the larger tournament.
This joint bid is strictly happening as a last-minute scramble to contend with the Trump administration. FIFA won't give a world cup to a country that won't let in Iranian fans, North Korean fans, Iraqi fans, etc. So the 10 games played in Canada in Mexico would be logistical support to back-door a potential travel ban. I guess they'd just cross their fingers that any teams from the travel banned countries don't make the knockout round somewhere in the US? Or they're counting on a more lax administration being in place when the time comes. Had Clinton been elected, US Soccer would've made a solo bid.
-
TimeForGuinness
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 20007
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm
Re: General Soccer Thread
...I know...it was more of a venting of frustrations.thrill wrote:FIFA won't let world cup games be played in anything smaller than NFL stadiums.TimeForGuinness wrote:I think it would have been nice to see a soccer stadium in St. Louis to host a game.Gashouse wrote:So what do you all think about the US-Mex-Can bid for 2026? I only read enough to see that 10 games would be played in mexico and canada each, and then the remaining 60 would be in the US. And isn't that the year it expands to 48 teams?
- lukethedrifter
- darjeeling sipping elite
- Posts: 37257
- Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
- Location: Huis Clos
Re: General Soccer Thread
Not even early games pitting small fan base countries? Can we put grass in the Ed?TimeForGuinness wrote:...I know...it was more of a venting of frustrations.thrill wrote:FIFA won't let world cup games be played in anything smaller than NFL stadiums.TimeForGuinness wrote:I think it would have been nice to see a soccer stadium in St. Louis to host a game.Gashouse wrote:So what do you all think about the US-Mex-Can bid for 2026? I only read enough to see that 10 games would be played in mexico and canada each, and then the remaining 60 would be in the US. And isn't that the year it expands to 48 teams?
