Famous Mortimer wrote:
I just don't understand the attitude of some people, the complete refusal to admit any other team has done anything right. If you portray all your opponents as half-wits, what does that say when they thrash you?
The Cubs have done a lot of things right. I think most everyone here freely admits that.
I think we're all debating the degree of difficulty here. We're splitting hairs about how impressive it is that the Cubs drafted the best hitter in the draft at #2 overall. Yes, it is good that they didn't whiff on a #2 pick like many teams in the past have done, but on the other hand it isn't exactly amazing that they drafted Bryant. Personally I think the jury is still out on drafting Schwarber at #4 overall. He's an impressive hitter, but he has to continue to hit a ton to justify a NL team taking a DH-in-waiting at #4.
The Cubs deserve a lot of credit for making some shrewd trades. Arrieta was an excellent pickup. The prospect exchange to bring in Rizzo was great. Being able to pick up a Russell for Samaddijidizidijada rental was a really good move. The Chapman rental turned out well (we'll see how the prospects involved pan out). The free agent front has been much more of a mixed bag. I thought they paid too much for Lester, but it worked for them last season. Glad they signed Heyward. The Jackson deal was pointless. Zobrist has been OK thus far. Fowler was a good pickup.
Anyway, there's credit where credit is due here. But back to the degree-of-difficulty, the Cubs have had a pretty nice safety net. They've been able to draft near the top for a few years. They have been able to sell some rental players. They can afford to have a hit-and-miss record in free agency. It is impressive that Theo's staff generally makes the right choices. I'm just not ready to anoint him as far-and-away the best executive in the game. Even his championship teams have been pretty damn fortunate to climb out of 0-3, 1-3, and 1-3 series deficits to win.