Tebow Talk
- Bo Hart
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 8770
- Joined: April 14 06, 9:50 pm
Re: Rant: Tebow
I think, at least relative to baseball, football stats are overrated. There is way too much of a team dynamic going on to put too much stock into individual numbers. This is especially true with Tebow and quarterback stats, considering he's not a traditional quarterback and doesn't play in a traditional-style offense. I also seriously entertain ideas and concepts like "clutch" and "intangibles" in football more so than baseball. Finally, I think Tebow has major Derek Jeter syndrome going on: polarization to the point that he's either so praised that he's overrated, or bashed so severely that he's underrated.
I think he did positively contribute to the Broncos run, but he obviously had a lot of assistance. In one of the games I watched, the Broncos kicked a game-tying 59-yard field goal as time expired. The real hero in that game was clearly Matt Prater.
I'm interested in seeing how his career plays out. I could see him becoming a decent quarterback and having a decent career, but I could see him transitioning to a new position within a couple years. I think that the future for him is largely an unknown.
I think he did positively contribute to the Broncos run, but he obviously had a lot of assistance. In one of the games I watched, the Broncos kicked a game-tying 59-yard field goal as time expired. The real hero in that game was clearly Matt Prater.
I'm interested in seeing how his career plays out. I could see him becoming a decent quarterback and having a decent career, but I could see him transitioning to a new position within a couple years. I think that the future for him is largely an unknown.
-
MrSaigon
Re: Rant: Tebow
I'm scratching my head here. Are you saying you absolutely love him and want to bare his children, or that he should be urinated on and sacrificed to Cthulu? Or are you exploring as yet traversed--anywhere--middle ground?Kyle wrote:I think, at least relative to baseball, football stats are overrated. There is way too much of a team dynamic going on to put too much stock into individual numbers. This is especially true with Tebow and quarterback stats, considering he's not a traditional quarterback and doesn't play in a traditional-style offense. I also seriously entertain ideas and concepts like "clutch" and "intangibles" in football more so than baseball. Finally, I think Tebow has major Derek Jeter syndrome going on: polarization to the point that he's either so praised that he's overrated, or bashed so severely that he's underrated.
I think he did positively contribute to the Broncos run, but he obviously had a lot of assistance. In one of the games I watched, the Broncos kicked a game-tying 59-yard field goal as time expired. The real hero in that game was clearly Matt Prater.
I'm interested in seeing how his career plays out. I could see him becoming a decent quarterback and having a decent career, but I could see him transitioning to a new position within a couple years. I think that the future for him is largely an unknown.
- Bo Hart
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 8770
- Joined: April 14 06, 9:50 pm
Re: Rant: Tebow
I'm ambivalent. I'm an innocent bystander that thinks that both sides have legitimate points to support their claims.MrSaigon wrote:I'm scratching my head here. Are you saying you absolutely love him and want to bare his children, or that he should be urinated on and sacrificed to Cthulu? Or are you exploring as yet traversed--anywhere--middle ground?
- Bo Hart
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 8770
- Joined: April 14 06, 9:50 pm
Re: Rant: Tebow
This is kind of off-topic, but, uhm... who was that guy for the Chiefs? The one that lead a team who had lost five of their last six to a victory over the undefeated Packers? He had like 299 yards passing. I always forget his name.Socnorb11 wrote:If the Broncos hadn't dumped Orton for Tebow, it would probably be about 9 in a row.jim wrote:If the bears don't just give the game away that would be 3 in a row.y
- AdmiralKird
- MBA, CPA, CFA, CFP, JD, PE, MD
- Posts: 10173
- Joined: March 7 07, 4:50 pm
- Location: Tycho Crater, Luna
Re: Rant: Tebow
possibly nsfw
-
Socnorb11
- The Last Word
- Posts: 21906
- Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am
Re: Rant: Tebow
Kyle wrote:This is kind of off-topic, but, uhm... who was that guy for the Chiefs? The one that lead a team who had lost five of their last six to a victory over the undefeated Packers? He had like 299 yards passing. I always forget his name.Socnorb11 wrote:If the Broncos hadn't dumped Orton for Tebow, it would probably be about 9 in a row.jim wrote:If the bears don't just give the game away that would be 3 in a row.y
It was the same guy that threw 3 interceptions and lost to the Packers in Week 4 (as a member of the Broncos).
FWIW, Green Bay has the 2nd worst pass defense in the NFL.
-
Michael
- GRB Founder
- Posts: 35303
- Joined: December 31 69, 6:00 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: Rant: Tebow
I believe that's because they run up the score on teams and use the prevent defense.Socnorb11 wrote:FWIW, Green Bay has the 2nd worst pass defense in the NFL.
- cardsfansince82
- is shooing asian children away from his fridge.
- Posts: 27776
- Joined: May 17 06, 10:23 pm
- Location: at the gettin' place
Re: Rant: Tebow
They also gamble a lot on coverages since they are playing from ahead all the time. The packers have 29 INTs, eight more than the second best team.
- Radbird
- There's someone in my head but it's not me
- Posts: 62008
- Joined: April 18 06, 5:08 pm
- Location: LF Bleachers @ Busch II
Re: Rant: Tebow
All I can say is if you think the Tebow coverage is too much where you live you should be thankful that you aren't in his home market.
-
Socnorb11
- The Last Word
- Posts: 21906
- Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am
Re: Rant: Tebow
Radbird wrote:All I can say is if you think the Tebow coverage is too much where you live you should be thankful that you aren't in his home market.
What's the vibe there, Rad. Positive? Negative? Mixed bag? Are people being reasonable?




